Dr. Colin Campbell van ASPO bezoekt BG

In de bijeenkomst 7 oktober heeft de BG met dr. Colin Campbell gediscussieerd over de productie van olie- en gasvoorraden. Volgens de spreker is het van belang zeer kritisch met statistieken over voorkomens om te gaan, aangezien er enorme financiële belangen op het spel staan en veel primaire gegevens dus bewust misleidend. In veel gevallen worden voorkomens overschat door bijvoorbeeld de OPEC en zijn er geen alternatieve gegevens beschikbaar. In dit machtsspel gaat het erom kritisch naar de ontwikkeling van olie en gas te kijken. Colin Campbell heeft dat gedaan en komt tot de volgende conclusie: De BG heeft hier de volgende punten aan toegevoegd:

Colin Campbell: "Understanding depletion is simple. Think of an Irish pub. The glass starts full and ends empty. There are only so many more drinks to closing time. It’s the same with oil. We have to find the bar before we can drink what’s in it."
See: http://www.peakoil.net/

Reactie Hans Holger Rogner (IAEA) en Convening Lead Author (CLA) van het hoofdstuk over energievoorraden in de World Energy Assessment van UNDP, UN-DESA en WEC ter voorbereiding van de World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg (2002).

I do not understand Colin's quote below: Yes the glass my be empty but then there is the cake of beer in the Pub and you refill your glass until closing time (which again is a policy constraint and not a constraint of the pysical availability of beer).

The problem with finding the bar is closely related to where you look. If the focus is entirely on oil at low production costs then the bars available may be limited. But then you move on to the night club where the beers costs more and off you go. Then if there many patrons more night clubs sping up and competition will drive down costs. Same with oil.

Campbell and Laherre have focussed on conventional oil and in that regard there will be a peak in production in the not so distant future. (well lately they have acknowledged the existence of non-conventional oil but maintain that these lack economic attrcativeness and are too much concentrated in a few countries). My point is that conventional oil is a too limiting concept. For one, the mere understaning of convential oil is dynamically changing with prices and technology. Moreover the vast spread of production costs, the concentration of lowest cost oil in countries controlled by OPEC, risk and uncertainty both as to suppply from Iraq and Iran and Al Queda influence in Saudi Arabia have limited investments in the development of non-OPEC conventional and unconventional oil. Also, investors shy away from higher costs oil investments given the risk that OPEC cranks up the pumps, floods the market and strands the investments in high cost oil. Hence we have a bit of a capacity squeeze given the somewhat underestimated (more ignorance than flawed analysis) demand development driven by developing countries. In the WEA I clearly stated that volatility will charactize the continued use of oil for reasons of investments (given a multi-year lag before bringing oil to the market) being out of syn with demand and geo-political factors. So I believe the current situation / market behavior in not inconsistent with the WEA. Nor would I come to a much different outlook from Campbell/Laherre if I fucused on conventional oil only.

As to other publications - I suggest the recent WEC congress publications on oil markets etc. The overall tenor in Sydney was quite optimistic.

Hans Holger Rogner

Een goede overzichtsanalyse over Peak Oil als follow-up van het bezoek van Colin Campbell is geschreven voor de Zwitserse Energie Stichting door LBST in München, die Peak Oil al jaren intensief volgen.

Link naar document LBST Countdown